DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 5. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
TNR mle em + hI a BRIT AMT |! 7 aA
ar LV VIA A
oa | Thaeisen 7 AAT
af Faye ai eo Vo-
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Te Secretary of the Navy
Subj
Ref ta) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Enel (1) DD Form 149 dtd 6 Feb 14 v attachments
(2) PERS-832 memo dtd 29 Sep 14
(3) CO, ECRC ltr dtd 9 Dec 14
(4)
74 4-4
d all the facts of record pertaining
error and injustice, finds as‘follows:
3 The Board, having reviewe
to Petitioner's allegations of
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existl ing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy
b. The contested letter requests a “legal hold” on Petitioner,
“involuntarily extending his enlistment for 6 months to complete
criminal investigation and courts-martial actions.”
c. Inenclosure (2), PERS-832, the Navy Personnel Command (NPC)
Enlisted Performance and Separation Branch, has commented to the
ertect they round notning in Petitioner's WYETicial Military
Personnel File (OMPF), other than the contested document,
referencing a pending or adjudicated legal case.
d. In enclosure (3), the current co, ECRC commented to the
effect that comment is declined as to whether action to include the
contested document in Petitioner's OMPF was correct.
e. In enclosure (4), PERS-00dJ, the NPC Assistant Legal Counsel,
commented to the effect that the contested document should be
removed, as “no evidence has been presented...that Petitioner
committed any crime to justify this memorandum, nor has a
court-martial been convened.”
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosure (4), the Board finds the existence
of an error and injustice warranting the following corrective action:
RECOMMENDATION :
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the
co, ECRC letter NOOL/070 dated 1 November 2010, Subject: Request for
Retention ICO Petitioner.
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
a
meee —
and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
Una 4. [brattur
JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Kecoraer
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it 1s hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of
the Navy.
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Fxecutive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4852 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. PERS-007 memo dtd 6 Apr 15 2 The Board, consisting of Messrs reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 April 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. e. Inenclosure (4), PERS-00J, the NPC Assistant Legal Counsel, commented to the effect that the contested document should be removed, as “no evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5419 14
NR5419-14 27 March 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy ; REVI Ref: (a) 10 U.8.C. The Board, consisting of Meee reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 26 March 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating — to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03295-07
In enclosure (2), PERS-311, the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) office with cognizance over performance evaluations, commented to the effect that the contested adverse performance evaluation report is valid, but that it does not appear in They recommended that he be asked to provide that he submit a grther action regarding Petitioner's OMPF., a signed copy for inclusion in his QMPF; this report be taken. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, notwithetanding...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR933-13
The Board, consisting of Ms. Lapinski and Messrs. Dikeman and McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 March 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. f. In enclosure (6), PERS-32, the NPC office with cognizance over performance evaluations, commented to the effect that in light of enclosures (4) and (5), Petitioner’s performance evaluation record should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02071-02
They further find the EM2 report for 10 October 2000 to 15 March 2001 should be removed as well, as Petitioner would not have been evaluated in this rate, but for the reduction. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing therefrom the following enlisted performance evaluation reports and related material: Period of Report Date of Report Reporting Senior From To 00Dec22 00Jan12 000ctO9 01Mar15 000ctlO 01Mar15 We recommend the report for the period 12 January 2000 to 9 October...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07732-02
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geisler, Pfeiffer and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 March 2003 , and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) office having cognizance over enlisted performance has commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request has merit and warrants...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04493-09
04493-09 9 October 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub): i co , REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. PERS-00J ltr dtd 10 Aug 09 w/enclosure PERS-834 ltr dtd 21 Aug 09 PERS-32 memo dtd 2 Sep 09 ty a ea mw “4: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing all reference to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2686 14
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hedrick, Marquez and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 October 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. In enclosure (4), PERS-32, the NPC office with cognizance over fitness reports, has commented to the effect that both contested fitness reports should be removed. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07603-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing his request dated 12 August 1985 for reassignment for humanitarian reasons “and all personal information involving this package.” Copies of pertinent documents appearing in Petitioner’s official microfiche record are at Tab A. (2), PERS-4OHH, the Navy Personnel c. In correspondence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03466-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the OPNAV 5350-2 Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report (DAAR) dated 17 November 1992, concerning drug screening. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Adams, Geisler and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 August 2003, and pursuant to its regulations, determined...